African Economic and Management Review https://www.nokspublishing.com/index.php/aemr <p>The <strong>African Economic and Management Review (AEMR)</strong> is an international, Africa-focused peer-reviewed journal publishing sound theoretical and empirical research in economics, business, management and related social sciences. It encourages applied economics and sound business practices that contribute to economic development in Africa, and the dissemination of research on business practices and corporate governance in Africa and beyond.</p> <p>AEMR supports research in Africa by providing constructive, achievable editorial feedback to help authors improve their manuscripts. It welcomes relevant contributions from researchers worldwide and maintains academic standards through initial editorial assessment and double-blind peer review.</p> <p><strong>No publication charges</strong></p> <p>Publication in the <strong>African Economic and Management Review (AEMR) is completely free for all authors</strong>. There are no submission fees, article processing charges (APCs), editing charges or publication fees.</p> <p>Prospective authors should read the <a href="https://nokspublishing.com/index.php/aemr/about/submissions#authorGuidelines">Author Guidelines</a> and register with the journal before submitting. For submission assistance, email <a href="mailto:aemr@nokspublishing.com">aemr@nokspublishing.com</a>.</p> <p><span style="font-size: 0.875rem;">Or send us WhatsApp message by clicking the link. <a title="Send Us WhatsApp Message" href="https://api.whatsapp.com/send?phone=447526110534&amp;text=Thank%20you%20for%20contacting%20us.%20You%20can%20drop%20your%20message/question,%20one%20of%20our%20team%20will%20respond%20to%20your%20question%20shortly."><strong>Click here to Send Us WhatsApp Message</strong></a></span></p> <p>Specific topics the journal covers include but not limited to:</p> <ul> <li class="show">General Economics,</li> <li class="show">Micro and Macro Economics,</li> <li class="show">Labour, International, Monetary, Health, Energy, Information Economics etc.</li> <li class="show">Business and Management studies, </li> <li class="show">Business and Financial Studies,</li> <li class="show">Accounting,</li> <li class="show">Marketing studies,</li> <li class="show">Corporate governance and conflict management,</li> <li class="show">Communication,</li> <li class="show">Marketing Theory and Applications,</li> <li class="show">Organizational Behavior and Theory,</li> <li class="show">Personnel and Industrial Relations,</li> <li class="show">Social and Political Studies,</li> <li class="show">Other Social Sciences Studies.</li> </ul> <p><strong>ISSN Number: 2814-3418</strong></p> Noks Publishing en-US African Economic and Management Review 2814-3418 <p>Authors retain copyright. The journal’s current publication licence is Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0): <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">CC BY 4.0 licence</a>. Readers may copy, share and adapt licensed material, including for commercial use, provided they give appropriate credit, link to the licence and indicate changes. No additional restrictions may be imposed. Third-party material is covered only where the article explicitly states that it is included in the licence; otherwise permission may be required. Authors grant the journal the right of first publication. This policy takes effect on 6 October 2026. Earlier articles retain the licence expressly stated in their published version unless the rights holders authorise a change.</p> From Collateral to Cash: A Legally Screened Finite-Horizon Decision Protocol https://www.nokspublishing.com/index.php/aemr/article/view/133 <p>Recovering legal title to collateral does not guarantee that a lender will collect cash. This conceptual study combines a legal-admissibility screen with a finite-horizon selling rule that permits repeated auctions or negotiated sales when their completion windows and legal conditions fit the time remaining. Illustrative calculations distinguish conditional proceeds, attempt costs, holding outlays, completion probabilities and cash at the cutoff. With two years available, auction-first yields 54.31 index units against 53.08 for direct sale; at 1.70 years, direct sale yields 51.13 against 50.21 for auction. The reversal results from packing assumed 0.50- and 0.85-year attempt windows, not evidence of auction superiority. A separately costed rental branch yields 46.86 at a hypothetical sale-completion probability of 0.70; matching the best two-year selling policy requires approximately 0.90. An algebraic decomposition identifies when continuation outweighs direct sale’s single-attempt advantage. China’s historical repossessed-asset rules and Ghana’s distinct default-notice, registry, valuation and realisation provisions supply conditional legal screens. The framework separates financial scheduling from legally completed disposal. No actual recoveries or causal effects are estimated.</p> Zhao Zhao Copyright (c) 2026 Zhao Zhao https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2026-10-29 2026-10-29 6 1 45 52 10.53790/aemr.v6i1.133 Population Growth, Cereal Yield, Land Availability and Real GDP per Capita in Five Agrarian Economies https://www.nokspublishing.com/index.php/aemr/article/view/137 <p>This study examines within-country associations among population growth, cereal yield, arable land per person, agricultural land share, and real GDP per capita in Afghanistan, Ethiopia, Niger, Tanzania, and Malawi. Descriptive comparisons use the available World Bank World Development Indicators series, while the principal fixed-effects analysis covers a balanced five-country panel for 2002–2022 (105 country-year observations). The principal two-way fixed-effects model finds no statistically detectable population-growth association with log real GDP per capita (β = 0.0118, 95% CI [−0.0661, 0.0898], p = .766). Log cereal yield is positively associated with GDP per capita in the principal model (β = 0.2864, 95% CI [0.1225, 0.4503], p = .0006), but this association is not statistically significant when country-specific linear trends are included (β = 0.0634, p = .133). The arable-land-per-person coefficient is positive in the principal model (β = 0.9063) but reverses sign under country-specific trends (β = −0.7186, p = .039). Excluding Afghanistan changes the population-growth estimate to −0.1617 (p = .013), indicating substantial country sensitivity. The interaction between population growth and cereal yield is imprecise and statistically insignificant (β = 0.1234, 95% CI [−0.1610, 0.4077], p = .395). These observational estimates are exploratory associations, not causal effects. The descriptive coexistence of declining arable land per person and rising cereal yields in four countries is not evidence that population pressure caused intensification; Niger’s yield series differs. The study therefore documents heterogeneous patterns and specification-sensitive associations rather than adjudicating between Malthusian and Boserupian mechanisms.</p> Essa Jamili Copyright (c) 2026 Essa Jamili https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2026-10-29 2026-10-29 6 1 30 44 10.53790/aemr.v6i1.137 Intra-African Agricultural Trade and Food Availability: Product-Level Panel Evidence https://www.nokspublishing.com/index.php/aemr/article/view/146 <p>This paper asks whether a larger intra-African share of food imports is associated with<br>higher national food availability and with less volatile availability. We merge BACI<br>bilateral trade flows with FAO Food Balance Sheets in a panel of 43 African importers and 81 product<br>units (37,102 observations, 2010 to 2023). The outcome is ln(1 + food supply quantity in kg per<br>person per year); models use country-product and year fixed effects, country-clustered errors and<br>wild bootstrap inference; fixed-effects Poisson (PPML) and weighted estimates serve as sensitivity<br>checks. Comparisons across country-product pairs show a positive association (+1.8% in 1<br>+ availability per 10 percentage points), which vanishes within pairs (-0.11%; 95% CI -0.30% to<br>+0.08%, on the same scale), that is -0.002 kg per person per year (95% CI -0.005 to +0.002) at the<br>median availability of 0.73 kg. A zero-inclusive PPML estimator gives -0.41% in availability (95% CI<br>-0.84% to +0.02%). Slopes differ across categories (p = 0.018), but negative estimates for oils and<br>pulses do not survive multiplicity adjustment. Supplier concentration is not significantly related to<br>volatility. These null results do not show that supplier origin cannot matter. To our<br>knowledge, few studies relate the supplier composition of imports to product-level availability in<br>Africa.&nbsp; Within pairs, availability is positively associated with import volumes, partly by<br>accounting construction, but not detectably with their supplier composition; integration may not be<br>well judged by its share alone, and monitoring could usefully track availability. The findings do not<br>evaluate trade facilitation, sourcing schemes or reserves.</p> Maminiaina Ramaroson Angela Mihantasoa Copyright (c) 2026 Maminiaina C. Ramaroson, Angela Mihantasoa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2026-10-29 2026-10-29 6 1 1 29 10.53790/aemr.v6i1.146